Peter Attia· MD
oftentimes if people have bilateral osteoarthritis they um they don't they don't need both sides done they're happy with one side that have a good one that they can reach out or something like that
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
oftentimes if people have bilateral osteoarthritis they um they don't they don't need both sides done they're happy with one side that have a good one that they can reach out or something like that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and oftentimes if people have bilateral osteoarthritis they um they don't they don't need both sides done they're happy with one side that have a good one that they can reach out or something like that