The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when you get when you're talking about numbers of less than 50 millisevers u that's kind of an arbitrary number so it's not like getting you know people who've got I I should have maybe gotten a chest X-ray when I had my cough last time but I just I just don't want to do this i don't want the exposure but it's so minimal in terms of biologic effect that we really don't even really worry about those even if it's getting one of them a month or so
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when you're talking about numbers of less than 50 millisevers u that's kind of an arbitrary number so it's not like getting you know people who've got I I should have maybe gotten a chest X-ray when I had my cough last time but I just I just don't want to do is I don't want the exposure but it's so minimal in terms of biologic effect that we really don't even really worry about those even if it's getting one of them a month or so
when you're talking about numbers of less than 50 millisevers but it's so minimal in terms of biologic effect that we really don't even really worry about those even if it's getting one of them a month or so