The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I don't know how I didn't realize you could make a case that roughly five to ten percent of the population will require this at some point in their life yeah if their active obviously a subset are a very sedentary and don't do much and they're not going to need it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so of the major surgery done in the hand yes by far okay by far
yeah if their activity obviously a subset are a very sedentary and don't do much and they're not going to need it and they'll wear a splint for the rest of their days but wow but if they're presenting with the pain that's the point we don't know what the in is but other than being the general population as a whole but people who present with pain yeah are active enough so would you say this is the single most common non-traumatic surgical repair of the hand um non-traumatic other than a well and even a trigger finger you could attribute to um so of the major surgery done in the hand yes by far okay by far