Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
and do you ever worry that you know if this epidemic what's to say this isn't going to get to be one in three kids in 30 years and are there enough people like you that are going to be able to help parents and help families and help children with that so so that I don't want to sound alarmist but I worry when we have an epidemic potentially and we don't have a great sense of causality yeah
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.