We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
the um downside to those treatments is usually recommend many years of therapy they have a lot of side effects that um uh are manageable for most women but when you're talking about a dcis leion which isn't a full-blown cancer um a lot of women wouldn't be sufficiently interested in the couple of percentage points reduction and the risk of recurrence or more dcis for having to take a medicine for for many many years that has side effects related to its anti-estrogen effects
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.