The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But stem cells are, they are notably hardy cells that can survive insults remarkably well and correct. So a cell that survives a genetic insult, a stem cell is particularly capable of detecting the damage, repairing the damage, correcting
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So a cell that survives a genetic insult, a stem cell is particularly capable of detecting the damage, repairing the damage, taking its sweet time in doing so and not spawning daughter cells until it's got its house back in order.