Peter Attia· MD
although there was never proof for this he insisted that it existed in 100 of all cancers
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
although there was never proof for this he insisted that it existed in 100 of all cancers
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so warburg tries to extend this to cancer he says the most fundamental thing about cancer is the shift to fermentation —