The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So a lot of the work that we've done is on people that have a severe form of paralysis and aphasia we typically I see refer to as someone who's got let's say a stroke. Yep. Um in the language centers of the brain. Um where we've focused recently is on patients that have a severe form paralysis like ALS. So there the problem is they have largely normal language but they can't get those can't get the motor signal out.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And for that individual by attaching a computer to their brain, you're able to hopefully extract in written cursive text, you know, whatever across the computer screen what they're wishing to say.
Where we've focused recently is on patients that have a severe form paralysis like ALS. So there the problem is they have largely normal language but they can't get those >> can't get the motor signal out.