The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So within this as you can imagine this is not inexpensive to do so in fact none of this is funded by NIH NIH I won't go into all the details but NIH is able to fund programs that are about this big people may or may not see this if they're just listening to me but very small amount this ends up being about two orders of magnitude larger in cost than anything that NIH can fund
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.