The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
is the reason that a person might select radiation therapy especially if it comes with androgen deprivation therapy because of the sexual function and urinary fun like what's the main advantage those are number one and number two yeah lack of incontinence and lack of impetence
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So is the reason that a person might select radiation therapy especially if it comes with androgen deprivation therapy because of the sexual function and urinary fun like what's the main advantage? Those are number one and number two. Yeah. Lack of incontinence and lack of impetence.