The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So currently it is uh you work with an uh an expert who has a lot of experience with autism and they do an analysis of someone's behavior um in the two areas that we look at social communication skills and the other is the repetitive behaviors restricted interest
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So currently it is uh you work with an uh an expert who has a lot of experience with autism and they do an analysis of someone's behavior um in the two areas that we look at social communication skills and the other is the repeative behaviors restricted interests