The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Um the cohort used by the Xi study was called the Boston birth cohort which u originally enrolled nearly 9,000 mother child pairs but among them pre-term births were quite over represented uh over 35%. By 2018 approximately 3,000 DIADs remained in the active uh follow-up cohort presumably due to um loss on follow-up.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.