The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's an ocean a zombie notion that sort of was hard to kill and many scientists still are distinctly uncomfortable with the notion not all of them anymore i think our team is winning but many people still are reluctant even if they're sophisticated and know the literature to accept the general principle that there are aging processes which can be slowed down if you consider them as as a unitary group of changes with a common controlling factor
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.