The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but in addition there are increasing incidence and prevalence of food allergies in general in the US so for example my colleague Ruchi Gupta out of Chicago she published data that one in every 12 children in the classroom in the US has a doctor's diagnosis at food allergy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in addition there are increasing incidence and prevalence of food allergies in general in the US
there are increasing incidents and prevalence of food allergies in general in the US