The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
We declared victory in 2001 on a kind of a rough draft of 92%. Actually, it was considered the final draft of a rough draft in 2001. It was final draft in 2004, but it was still haploid, meaning it was just one genome, while all...essentially, all of us are diploid, inheritance from mother and father, except for our gametes.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.