The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you've ever seen land that has been mono cropped by plants or plant farming it looks like scorched earth nothing grows there after a number of generations of this type of farming because all the nutrients have been removed they've gone into the plants then we need synthetic fertilizer oh wait that's very hard to get now because of the water with ukraine etc and synthetic fertilizer doesn't fully recreate the soil microbiome or the ecosystem's diversity
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.