The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
grim age is a pretty good predictor of time to coronary heart disease surprisingly these clocks even predict time to cancer and that is surprising because it's a measurement based on blood you know and so you could ask why would a measurement in blood be predictive of the onset of various types of cancers in other solid tissues
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And I would say right now GrimAge is the best in terms of predicting, what we would consider, all-cause mortality, so, basically any mortality risk all combined together. GrimAge is particularly good at cardiovascular risk mortality, which is why it does well at all-cause mortality because that's the biggest killer of people, at least in the United States.