The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so I mean the takeaway is I guess if you're if you go to see a doctor about a concern you have on hair loss find a specialist find someone who's gonna do a bunch of measurements you want to make as many objective measurements as possible absolutely we'll find somebody who does it full-time that's their area of expertise and specialty
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.