The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when someone goes up on their toes I want to make sure that their heel goes into Varys and that they recreate their Arch Peter has good arches here and sometimes that's a clue as to potential problems whether it be the hip the knee or even the ankle
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the angle of the foot is very important I'm looking at the heel alignment and when someone goes up on their toes I want to make sure that their heel goes into Varys and that they recreate their Arch Peter has good arches here and sometimes that's a clue as to potential problems whether it be the hip the knee or even the ankle