The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think about um wanting to stay out of the hospital. Mhm. being in a place where they are ready to or being forced to grapple with the reality that there is not um anything left to do to change what is happening in their body to change the cancer to delay the neurologic illness. um uh and or folks that are more explicitly ready to be supported in their end of life care or in their transition and and just done with chasing the treatment, you know, done with chemo.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.