The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the case fatality rate was 2.3 percent which is 1,000 patients of 44,000 672 confirmed and you can see here that 14 eight and it was much higher the case fatality rate was much higher in patients who were greater than 80 and significantly higher in patients who were 70 to 79 years old
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.