The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's hard for me to come to the conclusion that you're in trouble unless we can likewise see further markers such as expanding CI&T and CAC and so forth that's going to show that you actually are developing higher rates of atherosclerosis
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
generally speaking they tend to be very fit they tend to be very thin and often times and I'm you kind of had a story of your own from before I even got into this they'll say I really don't want to stop I really love this way of life I'm feel better than I ever have in my life and I give the same answer not too far different from yours and then I say okay generally speaking I feel like all of your markers look great low inflammation across the board