The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i usually tell my patients it's 10 so i've been understating this for some time i didn't realize it so all comers 20 of the population would be over 50 milligrams per deciliter yeah depending on on ethnicity so it's certainly above 15 no no doubt about it and some population especially in populations of of european ancestry they have the highest uh lpa level i'm sorry of african ancestry they have the uh highest lpa levels
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and some population especially in populations of of european ancestry they have the highest uh lpa level i'm sorry of african ancestry they have the uh highest lpa levels and they also have the highest lpa levels adjusted for uh lpa isoform size as well