The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if I see a patient with LP little-a I'm always screening them for aortic stenosis out of the gate I don't care if they're 30 years old I mean many of our patients are in their 30s and 40s but if they have an elevated LP little-a we're doing echo at a minimum and preferably cardiac MRI which is much more accurate to both look at the morphology of the aortic valve and get a very accurate gradient of pressure
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.