The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And in the future, all of this is gonna come within 10 years I think. You put your finger in a machine, and already there's a company in Boulder that can measure 1500 proteins in a finger prick of blood. And so we're gonna find which is the vulnerable protein that indicates that you're magnesium-deficient, and that's half the country, and tell you, "Hey, you're magnesium-deficient."
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.