The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
my testosterone was 700 i believe my shbg was high 60s and my igf-1 i believe was 112 with a z score of negative 0.5 which means i am one-half of a standard deviation below the average for humans in this country for americans whatever so basically with a ton of meat in my diet a ton of organs in my diet both fresh and desiccated from heart and soil and a lot of fruit and honey my igf-1 is below the mean it's below the average
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.