The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we can save the planet by eating meat because we'll be more nourished we will be healthier and we will be better for everyone in our lives and better problem solvers and when we source good quality animals from regenerative agriculture farms like white oak pastures we can contribute to a movement that no doubt is turning the tide in the environmental movement overall for the earth
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
meat is not the problem it's incredibly nutritious for humans when raised properly