Paul Saladino· MD
i'd say that it's really clear to say that that meat is optimal food for babies and kids
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i'd say that it's really clear to say that that meat is optimal food for babies and kids
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
meat is considered an optimal first food now fortified rice cereal is also considered an optimal first food which is complete in my opinion why you'd give your kid something that's fortified or needs to be fortified is absurd but i think it's important to note nonetheless that meat is widely considered to be an optimal first food
and in fact i would say that is the ideal first food for babies