The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but even dan buettner admits that meat is eaten in the blue zones and then sort of goes on quickly in this interview i'll show a clip from an interview he did with mark hyman to say but we've chosen with our blue zones commercials with our blue zones push to make it plant-based
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
now the first thing to point out is that in these regions except for loma linda meat is eaten unequivocally meat is eaten these people do not eat plant-based diets dan buettner would claim that meat is eaten as a condiment but i will show you lots of evidence in this podcast that is not the case
but even Dan Butner admits that meat is eaten in the blue zones and then sort of goes on quickly in this interview I'll show a clip from an interview he did with Mark Heyman to say but we've chosen with our blue zones uh commercials with our blue zones push to make it plant-based