The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and the usual progression is to start with someone like that who you know who someone who's close to you and then transition to a neutral person you know someone who you have know just a kind of a randomly picked person from the crowd or some public figure who you have no strong association with but who you can visualize and then you're wishing that person happiness wishing that they be free of suffering
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.