The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so andrew is one of my close friends and we got involved five years ago on some research and we i kind of did some some algorithm development for him at stanford on uh on a research project and he i screened him for breathing exercises if he and i did the same one that made me feel alert and calm that put him to sleep if i did the one that made him feel alert and calm that was an apnea sequence
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.