The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
right you want your attention to be absorbed in that object and in many of those practices the explicit goal is to do that so well that thoughts no longer arise right so you're really trying to get rid of thought in some basic sense the the arising of thought in that context is a sign that you're not meditating hard enough or one pointedly enough
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.