The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you're reading a proof and you don't understand it assume that the person who is presenting it doesn't know how to present it to you find somebody else and so I think that that really holds also for meditation which is there are just going to be some people who guide in a way that you're willing to be guided
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and so I would say to anybody who's listening to this who's feeling sort of bearish on meditation try a different app try a different guide try a different book try another way keep going till you find someone who can walk you through how to do this in a way that resonates