The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
these are all practices that help you to spot the gap between sensory input and cognitive response and so that you become more response able and so much as you you have a tiny gap within which you can choose your response as opposed to simply reflexively going through life like some type of slug that's been shocked in a skinner box or something and you you have more option ality you suddenly realize there are just more options on the menu
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Meditation is, it's a tool. It's a training platform, if you will, that teaches you a skill that for me, and I think people more sophisticated than me will be able to talk about much more nuance around this. Like to listen to Sam Harris talk about this, of course, it's infinitely more enlightening. For me, it's simply gap awareness. That's literally all I care about is the gap awareness between stimulus and response. I want a bigger gap.