The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and one of the primary tools in that toolbox is the ability to say i did a stupid thing i made a stupid mistake i did something that caused harm but just because i did something stupid or immoral does not necessarily make me a stupid person or an immoral person and to be able to say that thoughtfully and meaningfully is a very important thing to do
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the more people understand about how cognitive dissonance operates and how we are all susceptible to it the more helpful it is in understanding our own behavior