The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we create a relationship to co2 through these chemoreceptors this is why we see such variance in co2 sensitivity with human beings so if i've got somebody who's more anxious i can tell you right now that a more anxious human being is much more sensitive to co2 and over breathes a lot more somebody has asthma much more sensitive anybody who's dealing with some sort of sort of dis disability uh whose mechanical problems they're going to be coc2 co2 more co2 sensitive
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.