The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when they look at the discrepancy between for example a clinician P perspective or perception and the patients when they're asked by like someone else like an independent reviewer usually it's way underestimated how distressing or um impairing it is to quality of life
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when they look at the discrepancy between for example a conditions perspective or perception and the patients when they're asked by like someone else like an independent reviewer usually it's way underestimated how distressing or um impairing it is to quality of life