The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you can reach that but you want to be careful not to assume that you youve thought about everything in their their biology until you have right but but that said um I you were asking me the condition of someone who was like a psychological sexual dysfunction and um how what is the level of distress like when people identify it and they want it to be different it's extremely distressing and quite impairing to quality of life and it can be a mirror for very distressing feelings
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.