The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and if I just commit to that one rule that's like literally the Only Rule that I is is absolutely black and white which is this sounds very interesting Walter let me think about it for a couple of days and get back to you and then it just buys me the time to to try to do my own version of that um I still think I probably say yes to more than I should but I I think that that uh you know that one step has probably saved me 80% yeah
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.