The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think that you you so I think that's part of the cultivation of that of that uh which at the from the outside would seem like such a leap right coming from zero you would look at that and you'd be like that seems like such a massive leap that you would all of a sudden be able to recalibrate your reaction to fear which ends up actually being useful in other dangerous situations
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.