The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I remember shortly after listening to it I had someone who I really liked respected called me and said hey I really like you to be on the board of such-and-such and I mean deep down I knew it was gonna be a pain in the ass I knew it was just gonna be so much work and even just the travel of getting to the board meetings was like wasn't in a place where there was easy access and other things and I remember like thinking I just I just got to do this I just got to do this
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I've definitely improved on it in the sense that there was a day when I couldn't say no or wouldn't say no to anything or anyone the pendulum was pretty far off on one side where I was basically on a treadmill of sort of saying yes to anything and everything that was asked of me began to realize that that just couldn't do that anymore