Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
is it a neural circuit uh you know state of some kind a capability of a neural circuit that can become exhausted we know neurons can run out of uh energy this is part of how the brain stimulation to cause inhibition works but that's all in a very fast time scale exhaust neurons on seconds to minutes it's not known what really could get exhausted on the week's uh scale we don't know what that would be or maybe it's a it's a it's the termination mechanism but it just overshoots
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.