The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if we're not acting that way then it points like there's something going on that's not consistent with that sort of simple um almost Common Sense understanding of how to make our lives better and that will Point towards something in the mental health Spectrum right which which the vast majority of times has its roots in trauma
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if on discussion the person is sharing something about their inner world that's not consistent with what you're necessarily seeing on the outside right and then their sharing of that dissonance right then leads to ah there's something going on here that