The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the companionate part is ascendant throughout you know the uh throughout your marriage whereas the passion part is not as high as it used to be and that's completely okay that's healthy normal and actually advisable um because it's more sustainable over the long run
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
whereas most of the truly happy people as they get older they do have a spousal partner where that's companionate in terms of his love which also has some passion but the companionate part is a ended throughout you know the uh throughout your marriage whereas the passion part is not as high as it used to be and that's completely okay that's healthy normal and actually advisable