Peter Attia· MD
it's a necessary but not necessarily sufficient criteria for great therapy
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's a necessary but not necessarily sufficient criteria for great therapy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's probably been out there for some time which is the training of the therapist the credentials of the therapist all of these things probably don't matter as much as the rapport that is built between the therapist and the client maybe i'm stating that slightly incorrectly but what i took away from it was it's at least as important how much of a rapport the client and the therapist have is how you know voluminous the knowledge is of the therapist is that is that an accurate statement it's very accurate
so let's take that as a necessary but not sufficient piece of the equation