We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
any number of things can go wrong and one is people can wander around and get themselves into dangerous situations in my case I ended up coming out of my trip very late at night walking on the side of a street with cars whizzing by me I mean that could have very easily been the end and that scared me enough that I stopped I said never again too dangerous
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.