The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the immigrants the the recent immigrants and the uh possible you know genetic link to have the you know in recent times to have the get up and go to leave to take the risks to have the energy uh to have the motivation to and uh to to actually make it happen to sustain it this complex goal with with so many possible downsides that's that's no small thing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the immigrants the the recent immigrants and the possible you know genetic link to have the you know in recent times to have the get up and go to leave uh to take the risks to have the energy uh to have the motivation to and uh a to actually make it happen to sustain it this complex goal with with so many uh possible downsides