The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I remember standing on my first time they kept final along the blue line in Edmonton and being so amped up that when the anthem finished my whole right side of my eye got blurry and I played about 20 seconds of the first shift and then went off to the dressing room I had to lay on the training room table for five minutes in order - just get vision back whatever happened just way too amped up way too ready to go away too excited
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.