The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the warriors that were well connected socially i mean i don't mean status wise i mean that that were that were embed well embedded in the community um would come back from these very violent raids with you know what sort of startle response and some other sort of surface level trauma reactions like they jump at loud noises or whatever sometimes nightmares you know whatever like but they wouldn't get depression the depression component of ptsd was not something they had to
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.