The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I had a lot of fear of public speaking. I would go into the mall and tell jokes to random people. . . . So I would do this and most of the time, people would laugh at my bad jokes and look at me like I'm insane. I'd still get that. I did get over that anxiety of having people think I'm crazy or just like that awkwardness of like talking to someone. Now I'm communicating science to people. So it worked for me.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.